07-98
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR EIS CONTRACT AWARD
Proposal shall be evaluated on the criteria listed below.
I. TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA (80%)
Proposals shall be evaluated on evaluation factors (A) through (B) shown
below. Factors (a) thru (d) are listed in descending order of importance.
A. TECHNICAL STRATEGY
1. EIS approach minimum requirements: develop a strategy for preparing
the EIS showing an understanding of the research work needed to
accomplish the task, and provide the needed information to identify
impacts and determine the appropriate mitigation. List the studies that
the offeror will undertake including surveys, interviews, contacts and
other sources of information that the offeror will use.
2. EIS process minimum requirements: indicate the EIS process schedule
that the offeror anticipates will be an adequate amount of time to
accomplish the task using the EIS approach discussed, above. Provide a
statement of the EIS process that the offeror will use to perform the
task.
B. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
In order to be considered for award, the offeror must be able to provide
the personnel needed to complete all phases of the work stated in the
statement of work, present a management plan that indicates the
availability of the personnel, and meet the minimum experience
requirements. At a minimum, offerors will include personnel with
experience in site selection feasibility and evaluation of medical
facility projects, or similar type projects. The labor categories of
project manager, principal engineer, civil engineering, biologist/wildlife
specialist and water quality specialist are designated as key personnel.
1. Key personnel:
(a) Key personnel will be evaluated according to their ability to
meet the minimum standards set forth in Attachment M-1 to this
Section M, and to complete all phases of work.
(b) Advance degree and additional education beyond the minimums
specified will be evaluated.
(c) Specialized experience beyond the minimums specified in
Attachment M-1 will be evaluated. However, the experience must
relate directly to the performance requirements of the position.
The additional work experience must indicate an ability to perform
above the minimum standards stated for the respective positions.
2. At a minimum, the firm shall have at least one of the following
qualifications:
71
Previous Page
