PHYSICAL SECURITY STRATEGIES FOR
NEW AND RENOVATION VA CONSTRUCTION
A. ISSUE:
Physical Security Strategies for VA facilities.
B. BACKGROUND:
There are several Statutes and Presidential Executive Orders mandating VA's
response to national emergencies and implementation of programs to provide for
the security and continued operation of VA's critical facilities. These include:
Presidential Executive Order 12656, issued November 18, 1988, and
Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-7, issued December 17,
2003, address policies requiring VA to protect its critical facilities;
Public Law 107-188 enacted June 12, 2002, addresses VA's support of
the Federal response to public health emergencies; and
Public Law 107-287 enacted November 7, 2002, addresses VA's actions
in response to chemical or biological risks as part of the Federal response
to public health emergencies.
C. DISCUSSION:
Development of strategies VA, in collaboration with the National Institute of
Building Sciences (NIBS) assembled a task group of multi-disciplinary volunteer
experts and a project team representing the healthcare, facility, security, and
cemetery sectors to advise VA on major emergency and disaster threats and
how best to evaluate its facilities vulnerabilities against these threats. Based on
this input VA developed a methodology to assess the vulnerability of its critical
facilities, provide mitigation solutions to protect VA patients, employees, and
visitors, and maintain the operational capability of mission critical facilities
during a natural or man-made extreme events. Utilizing this assessment
methodology, VA assessed 140 of its critical facilities and identified a need to
provide standards that would mitigate the systemic vulnerabilities identified.
Physical Security Strategies Report: VA developed, with the assistance of
NIBS', Physical Security Strategies Report that identified critical design elements
to improve the capability of VA facilities to function and provide services in
support of the Federal National Emergency Management Plan. The Report
identified strategies for new and existing Mission Critical, and new and existing
Life Safety Protected facilities. Both new and existing Mission Critical facilities